Another example of how we encounter rhetorics day to day. The author has taken a different approach to present presidents’ decision to
fall back from bombing Iran, versus the approach the other author did in my
previous blog. He gives only two reasons being that “150 Iranians might have
been killed”, and that “the proposed airstrikes in responded to the shooting
down of a U.S drone would have dangerously escalated a confrontation with
Tehran”. This author has chosen to pave a clear path for readers by not
burdening them with several reasons, but narrowing things down to two reasons,
and letting readers know that the president should “set realistic goals”.
[1 image, 1 links, 3 quotation, 110 words].
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.